This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. Learn more

Sign up to follow your favorite podcasts and listen to episodes!

AWA145 - Were Philip and Alexander uniquely competent?

Ancient Warfare Podcast


Murray tackles this question from Juan; It seems that Phillip/Alexander’s army was almost invincible but afterwards “Macedonian” style armies seem to be a lot more hit and miss (vs. Romans, Indians, Parthians, Celts etc.). Was this because Philip/Alexander’s troops were uniquely competent/trained or were the commanders after Alexander just not as good? I’m mostly thinking about the pike phalanx but if there’s any information on the light infantry or cavalry troops I’d love to learn!

Like the podcast? Why not become a patron?

Disclaimer: the content and artwork of this podcast are the property of its owner and are not affiliated with nor endorsed by Audiotrails.